Article
Diurnal variation of plasma cortisol and homovanillic acid in healthy subjects

https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4530(95)00033-XGet rights and content

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between plasma levels of cortisol, the dopamine metabolite homovanillic acid (HVA) and norepinephrine in healthy human subjects. Plasma cortisol and HVA levels were measured at 0800h, and in an integrated sampling procedure involving samples every 15 min between 1300 and 1600h. Plasma norepinephrine was measured at 0800 and 1300h. Cortisol, HVA and norepinephrine indices did not show significant correlations with each other. Both cortisol and HVA showed significant decreases over time. Longitudinal Random Effects (LRE) models were used to test whether individual cortisol and HVA curves over time were correlated; significant corelations were not found with this procedure. While significant correlations between cortisol and catecholamine indices have been reported in depressed patients, our results do not suggest such correlations in healthy subjects.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (46)

  • Self-disclosure is associated with adrenocortical attunement between new acquaintances

    2021, Psychoneuroendocrinology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The relationship between self-disclosure and adrenocortical attunement was consistent with that observed in our primary analysis with this data point winsorized, b = 0.03, SE = 0.02, β = 0.27, t(59) = 1.97, p = .053, 95% CI: − 0.0005–0.062. Third, because individual cortisol responses change over the course of the day (Posener et al., 1996), we conducted an analysis adjusting for the average time since waking across the two members of the dyad (which itself was not a significant predictor of attunement: b <0.001, SE = 0.0001, β = 0.02, t(58) = 0.12, p = .91, 95% CI: − 0.0002–0.0002). The relationship between self-disclosure and adrenocortical attunement was consistent with that observed in our primary analysis when adjusting for time since waking, b = 0.04, SE = 0.02, β = 0.28, t(58) = 1.99, p = .051, 95% CI: − 0.0002–0.08.

  • Stress, cortisol, and social hierarchy

    2020, Current Opinion in Psychology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Controllability has emerged as a key factor predicting the cortisol response to stress, with uncontrollable (versus controllable) acute stressors eliciting a stronger cortisol response [5] and uncontrollable (versus controllable) chronic stressors predicting the pattern of cortisol across the day [6]. The typical diurnal pattern consists of relatively high levels in the morning (with an immediate spike in cortisol in the first 45 min post-awakening) followed by a steady decline throughout the day [7]. Chronic, uncontrollable stressors tend to be associated with a flatter diurnal slope [6], a pattern linked to increased cardiovascular mortality risk [8].

  • Cookie or clementine? Psychophysiological stress reactivity and recovery after eating healthy and unhealthy comfort foods

    2019, Psychoneuroendocrinology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Eligible participants were invited to complete a 2.5-hour lab visit and provided informed consent. Lab visits were conducted between 1330 h and 1700 h to control for daily diurnal cortisol rhythm (Posener et al., 1996). The primary lab activities are outlined in Fig. 1.

  • Linking child temperament, physiology, and adult personality: Relations among retrospective behavioral inhibition, salivary cortisol, and shyness

    2017, Personality and Individual Differences
    Citation Excerpt :

    For our second regression, we performed identical analyses as the first, with the exception that we replaced childhood social behavioral inhibition with nonsocial behavioral inhibition. All analyses were controlled for oral contraceptive use in females, which are known to influence cortisol levels (Kirschbaum, Pirke, & Hellhammer, 1995), as well as controlled for mean time of sample collection given cortisol levels are known to have a diurnal rhythm with levels tending to decline throughout the day (Posener, Schildkraut, Samson, & Schatzberg, 1996). Time of day was not systematically related to participant age, total salivary cortisol output, retrospective behavioral inhibition, or shyness.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text