Psychoneuroendocrinology
Volume 34, Issue 4 , Pages 497-512 , May 2009

MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: A review

  • Jan Havlicek

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Husnikova 2075, 155 00 Prague, Czech Republic
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Husnikova 2075, 158 00 Prague 13, Czech Republic. Tel.: +420 251 620 283.
    • ,
  • S. Craig Roberts

      Affiliations

    • Evolutionary Psychology and Behavioural Ecology Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK

Received 14 February 2008 ,Revised 11 October 2008 ,Accepted 13 October 2008.

References 

  1. Apanius V, Penn D, Slev PR, Ruff LR, Potts WK. The nature of selection on the major histocompatibility complex. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 1997;17:179–224
  2. Austyn JM, Wood KJ. Principles of Cellular and Molecular Immunology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994;
  3. Bazer FW. The Endocrinology of Pregnancy. Totowa: Humana Press; 1998;
  4. Bereczkei T, Gyuris P, Koves P, Bernath L. Homogamy, genetic similarity, and imprinting; parental influence on mate choice preferences. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 2002;33:677–690
  5. Bernatchez L, Landry C. MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: what have we learned about natural selection in 15 years?. J. Evolution Biol. 2003;16:363–377
  6. Beydoun H, Saftlas AF. Association of human leukocyte antigen sharing with recurrent spontaneous abortions. Tissue Antigens. 2004;65:123–135
  7. Boero F. MHC and mate selection in humans?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1996;11:24
  8. Brown RE. What is the role of the immune system in determining individually distinct body odors. Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 1995;17:655–661
  9. Brown JL. A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behav. Ecol. 1997;8:60–65
  10. Brown JL. The new heterozygosity theory of mate choice and the MHC. Genetica. 1999;104:215–221
  11. Brown JL, Eklund A. Kin recognition and the major histocompatibility complex – an integrative review. Am. Nat. 1994;143:435–461
  12. Buston PM, Emlen ST. Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: the relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003;100:8805–8810
  13. Carrington M, Nelson GW, Martin MP, Kissner T, Vlahov D, Goedert JJ, et al. HLA and HIV-1: heterozygote advantage and B*35-Cw*04 disadvantage. Science. 1999;283:1748–1752
  14. Coetzee V, Barrett L, Greeff JM, Henzi SP, Perrett DI, Wadee AA. Common HLA alleles associated with health, but not with facial attractiveness. PLoS One. 2007;2:e640
  15. Ditchkoff SS, Lochmiller RL, Masters RE, Hoofer SR, van den Bussche RA. Major-histocompatibility-complex-associated variation in secondary sexual traits of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus): evidence for good-genes advertisement. Evolution. 2001;55:616–625
  16. Eggert F, Wobst B, Zavazava N, Müller-Ruchholtz W, Ferstl R. Psychobiology of the immune system: behavioural factors in the maintenance of immunogenetical variability. Psychol. Beitr. 1994;36:152–157
  17. Eggert F, Ferstl R, Müller-Schwarze D. MHC and olfactory communication in humans. In:  Johnston RE,  Müller-Schwarze D,  Sorensen PW editor. Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. New York: Kluwer Academic; 1999;p. 181–207
  18. Ferstl R, Eggert F, Pause B, Schuler M, Luszyk M, Westphal E, et al. Immune system signaling to the other's brain: MHC-specific body scents in humans. In:  Frederickson RCA,  McGaugh JL,  Felten DL editor. Peripheral Signalling of the Brain. Toronto: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers; 1991;p. 497–501
  19. Ferstl R, Eggert F, Westphal E, Zavazava N, Müller-Ruchholtz W. MHC-related odors in humans. In:  Doty RL,  Müller-Schwarze D editor. Chemical Signals in Vertebrates VI. New York: Plenum Press; 1992;p. 205–211
  20. Foerster K, Delhey K, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT, Kempenaers B. Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature. 2003;425:714–717
  21. Gangestad SW, Cousins AJ. Adaptive design, female mate preferences, and shifts across the menstrual cycle. Annu. Rev. Sex Res. 2001;12:145–185
  22. Garver-Apgar CE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Miller RD, Olp JJ. Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychol. Sci. 2006;17:830–835
  23. Giphart MJ, D’Amaro J. HLA and reproduction?. J. Immunogen. 1983;10:25–29
  24. Gower DB, Holland KT, Mallet AI, Rennie PJ, Watkins WJ. Comparison of 16-androstene steroid concentrations in sterile apocrine sweat and axillary secretions – interconversions of 16-androstenes by the axillary microflora – a mechanism for axillary odor production in man. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1994;48:409–418
  25. Griffiths RW, Kunz PR. Assortative mating: a study of physiognomic homogamy. Soc. Biol. 1973;20:448–453
  26. Havlicek J, Lenochova P. Environmental effects on human body odour. In:  Hurst JL,  Beynon RJ,  Roberts SC,  Wyatt TD editor. Chemical Signals in Vertebrates XI. New York: Springer; 2008;p. 199–212
  27. Havlicek J, Roberts SC, Flegr J. Women's preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biol. Lett. 2005;1:256–259
  28. Havlicek J, Dvorakora R, Bartos L, Flegr J. Non-advertized does not mean concealed: body odor changes across the human menstrual cycle. Ethology. 2006;112:81–90
  29. Havlicek J, Saxton TK, Roberts SC, Jozifkova E, Lhota S, Valentova J, et al. He sees, she smells? Male and female reports of sensory reliance in mate choice and non-mate-choice contexts. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 2008;45:565–570
  30. Hedrick PW. Pathogen resistance and genetic variation at MHC loci. Evolution. 2002;56:1902–1908
  31. Hedrick PW, Black FL. HLA and mate selection: no evidence in South Amerindians. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997;61:505–511
  32. Hedrick PW, Loeschcke V. MHC and mate selection in humans?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1996;11:24
  33. Hinsz VB. Facial resemblance in engaged and married couples. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 1989;6:223–229
  34. Ihara Y, Aoki K, Tokunaga K, Takahashi K, Juji T. HLA and human mate choice: tests on Japanese couples. Anthropol. Sci. 2000;108:199–214
  35. Jacob S, McClintock MK, Zelano B, Ober C. Paternally inherited HLA alleles are associated with women's choice of male odor. Nat. Genet. 2002;30:175–179
  36. Jacob TJC, Fraser C, Wang LW, Walker V, O’Connor S. Psychophysical evaluation of responses to pleasant and mal-odour stimulation in human subjects; adaptation, dose response and gender differences. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2003;48:67–80
  37. Jin K, Speed TP, Thomson G. Tests of random mating for a highly polymorphic locus – application to HLA data. Biometrics. 1995;51:1064–1076
  38. Jones BC, Perrett DI, Little AC, Boothroyd L, Cornwell RE, Feinberg DR, et al. Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2005;272:347–354
  39. Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Perrett DI, Little AC, Feinberg DR, Law-Smith MJ. Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2008;37:78–84
  40. Jordan WC, Bruford MW. New perspectives on mate choice and the MHC. Heredity. 1998;81:127–133
  41. Koehler N, Rhodes G, Simmons LW. Are human female preferences for symmetrical male faces enhanced when conception is likely?. Anim. Behav. 2002;64:233–238
  42. Law-Smith MJ, Perrett DI, Jones BC, Cornwell RE, Moore FR, Feinberg DR, et al. Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2006;273:135–140
  43. Leinders-Zufall T, Brennan P, Widmayer P, Chandramani P, Maul-Pavicic A, Jager M, et al. MHC class I peptides as chemosensory signals in the vomeronasal organ. Science. 2004;306:1033–1037
  44. Lenochova P, Roberts SC, Havlicek J. Methods of human body odor sampling: the effect of freezing. Chem. Senses. 2009;34(2):127–138
  45. Lie H, Simmons L, Rhodes G. Genetic diversity revealed in human faces. Evolution. 2008;62:2473–2486
  46. Little AC, Perrett DI. Putting beauty back in the eye of the beholder: evolution and individual differences in face preference. Psychologist. 2002;15:28–32
  47. Little AC, Jones BC, Penton-Voak IS, Burt DM, Perrett DI. Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2002;269:1095–1100
  48. Little AC, Perrett DI, Penton-Voak IS, Burt DM. Evolution and individual differences in face preferences. In:  Aoki K,  Akazawa T editor. Human Mate Choice and Prehistorical Marital Networks. Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies; 2002;p. 101–113
  49. Little AC, Jones BC, Burt DM, Perrett DI. Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biol. Psychol. 2007;76:209–216
  50. McClintock MK, Schumm P, Jacob S, Zelano B, Ober C. The MHC and body odors: arbitrary effects caused by shifts of mean pleasantness – Reply. Nat. Genet. 2002;31:237–238
  51. Milinski M. The function of mate choice in sticklebacks: optimizing MHC genetics. J. Fish Biol. 2003;63:1–16
  52. Milinski M, Wedekind C. Evidence for MHC-correlated perfume preferences in humans. Behav. Ecol. 2001;12:140–149
  53. Milinski M, Griffiths S, Wegner KM, Reusch TBH, Haas-Assenbaum A, Boehm T. Mate choice decisions of stickleback females predictably modified by MHC peptide ligands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005;102:4414–4418
  54. Nordlander C, Hammarström L, Lindblom B, Edvard Smith CIE. No role of HLA in mate selection. Immunogenetics. 1983;18:429–431
  55. Nowak MA, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Austyn JM. The optimal number of major histocompatibility complex molecules in an individual. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992;89:10896–10899
  56. Ober C. Studies of HLA, fertility and mate choice in a human isolate. Hum. Reprod. Update. 1999;5:103–107
  57. Ober C, Elias S, Kostyu DD, Hauck WW. Decreased fecundability in Hutterite couples sharing HLA-DR. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1992;50:6–14
  58. Ober C, Weitkamp LR, Cox N, Dytch H, Kostyu D, Elias S. HLA and mate choice in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997;61:497–504
  59. Ober C, Hyslop T, Elias S, Weitkamp LR, Hauck WW. Human leukocyte antigen matching and fetal loss: results of a 10 year prospective study. Hum. Reprod. 1998;13:33–38
  60. Partridge L. Non-random mating and offspring fitness. In:  Bateson P editors. Mate Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983;p. 227–253
  61. Pause BM, Krauel K, Schraders C, Sojka B, Westphal E, Muller-Ruchholtz W, et al. The human brain is a detector of chemosensorily transmitted HLA-class I-similarity in same- and opposite-sex relations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2006;273:471–478
  62. Penn DJ. The scent of genetic compatibility: sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex. Ethology. 2002;108:1–21
  63. Penn DJ, Potts WK. How do major histocompatibility complex genes influence odor and mating preferences?. Adv. Immunol. 1998;69:411–436
  64. Penn DJ, Potts WK. Chemical signals and parasite-mediated sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1998;13:391–396
  65. Penn DJ, Potts WK. The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. Am. Nat. 1999;153:146–163
  66. Penn DJ, Damjanovich K, Potts WK. MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002;99:11260–11264
  67. Piertney SB, Oliver MK. The evolutionary ecology of the major histocompatibility complex. Heredity. 2006;96:7–21
  68. Pollack MS, Wysocki CJ, Beauchamp GK, Braun D, Callaway C, Dupont B. Absence of HLA association or linkage for variations in sensitivity to the odor of androstenone. Immunogenetics. 1982;15:579–589
  69. Puurtinen M, Ketola T, Kotiaho JS. Genetic compatibility and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005;20:157–158
  70. Rennie PJ, Gower DB, Holland KT, Mallet AI, Watkins WJ. The skin microflora and the formation of human axillary odor. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 1990;12:197–207
  71. Rennie PJ, Gower DB, Holland KT. In-vitro and in-vivo studies of human axillary odor and the cutaneous microflora. Br. J. Dermatol. 1991;124:596–602
  72. Rikowski A, Grammer K. Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 1999;266:869–874
  73. Roberts SC, Little AC. Good genes, complementary genes and human mate choice. Genetica. 2008;132:309–321
  74. Roberts SC, Havlicek J, Flegr J, Hruskova M, Little AC, Jones BC, et al. Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2004;271:S270–S272
  75. Roberts SC, Gosling LM, Spector TD, Miller P, Penn DJ, Petrie M. Body odor similarity of non-cohabiting twins. Chem. Senses. 2005;30:651–656
  76. Roberts SC, Little AC, Gosling LM, Jones BC, Perrett DI, Carter V, et al. MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans. Biol. Lett. 2005;1:400–403
  77. Roberts SC, Little AC, Gosling LM, Perrett DI, Carter V, Jones BC, et al. MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2005;26:213–226
  78. Roberts SC, Gosling LM, Carter V, Petrie M. MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2008;275:2715–2722
  79. Rosenberg LT, Cooperman D, Payne R. HLA and mate selection. Immunogenetics. 1983;17:89–93
  80. Sans M, Alvarez I, Callegari-Jacques SM, Salzano FM. Genetic similarity and mate selection in Uruguay. J. Biosoc. Sci. 1994;26:285–289
  81. Santos PSC, Schinemann JA, Gabardo J, Bicalho MD. New evidence that the MHC influences odor perception in humans: a study with 58 Southern Brazilian students. Horm. Behav. 2005;47:384–388
  82. Sauermann U, Nürnberg P, Bercovitch FB, Berard JD, Trefilov A, Widdig A, et al. Increased reproductive success of MHC class II heterozygous males among free-ranging rhesus macaques. Hum. Genet. 2001;108:249–254
  83. Schaal B, Porter RH. “Microsomatic humans” revisited: the generation and perception of chemical signals. Adv. Study Behav. 1991;20:474–482
  84. Seddon N, Amos W, Mulder RA, Tobias JA. Male heterozygosity predicts territory size, song structure and reproductive success in a cooperatively breeding bird. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 2004;271:1823–1829
  85. Singh D, Bronstad PM. Female body odour is a potential cue to ovulation. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 2001;268:797–801
  86. Spehr M, Kelliher KR, Li XH, Boehm T, Leinders-Zufall T, Zufall F. Essential role of the main olfactory system in social recognition of major histocompatibility complex peptide ligands. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:1961–1970
  87. Stoddart M. The Scented Ape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990;
  88. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1999;3:452–460
  89. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. The scent of symmetry: a human sex pheromone that signals fitness?. Evol. Hum. Behav. 1999;20:175–201
  90. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW, Miller R, Scheyd G, McCollough JK, Franklin M. Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women. Behav. Ecol. 2003;14:668–678
  91. Vollrath F, Milinski M. Fragrant genes help Damenwahl. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1995;10:307–308
  92. Wedekind C. The MHC and body odors: arbitrary effects caused by shifts of mean pleasantness. Nat. Genet. 2002;31:237
  93. Wedekind C, Füri S. Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 1997;264:1471–1479
  94. Wedekind C, Seebeck T. MHC and mate selection in humans? Reply. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1996;11:24–25
  95. Wedekind C, Seebeck T, Bettens F, Paepke AJ. MHC-dependent mate preference in humans. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 1995;260:245–249
  96. Wedekind C, Seebeck T, Bettens F, Paepke AJ. The intensity of human body odors and the MHC: should we expect a link?. Evol. Psychol. 2006;4:85–94
  97. Wobst B, Zavazava N, Luszyk D, Lange K, Ussat S, Eggert F, et al. Molecular forms of soluble HLA in body fluids: potential determants of body odor cues. Genetica. 1998;104:275–283
  98. Yamazaki K, Boyse EA, Mike V, Thaler HT, Mathieson BJ, Abbott J, et al. Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. J. Exp. Med. 1976;144:1324–1335
  99. Yamazaki K, Yamaguchi M, Baranoski L, Bard J, Boyse EA, Thomas L. Recognition among mice. Evidence from the use of a Y-maze differentially scented by congenic mice of different major histocompatibility types. J. Exp. Med. 1979;150:755–760

PII: S0306-4530(08)00266-7

doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.007

Psychoneuroendocrinology
Volume 34, Issue 4 , Pages 497-512 , May 2009

Article Tools