Elsevier

Psychoneuroendocrinology

Volume 39, January 2014, Pages 249-256
Psychoneuroendocrinology

Remembering under stress: Different roles of autonomic arousal and glucocorticoids in memory retrieval

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.09.020Get rights and content

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that stress impairs memory retrieval. Glucocorticoids, released with a delay of several minutes in response to stressful experiences, are thought to play a key role in the stress-induced retrieval impairment. Accordingly, most studies on the impact of stress on retrieval tested memory a considerable time after stressor exposure, when glucocorticoid levels were elevated. Here, we asked how stress affects memory when retrieval takes place under stress, that is, when stress is part of the retrieval situation and glucocorticoids are not yet increased at the time of testing. To contrast stress effects on ongoing and delayed memory retrieval, 72 participants learned first neutral and emotional material. Twenty-four hours later, half of the learned material was tested either in a stressful, oral examination-like testing situation or in a standard, non-stressful free recall test. Memory for the other half of the learned material was assessed 25 min after the first, stressful or non-stressful retention test. Significant increases in blood pressure and salivary cortisol confirmed the stress induction by the first, examination-like testing situation. Retrieval performance under stress was positively correlated with the blood pressure response to the stressor but unaffected by cortisol. Conversely, retrieval performance 25 min post stress was negatively correlated with the cortisol response to the stressor, particularly for emotional items. These results suggest that the same stressor may have opposite effects on ongoing and delayed memory retrieval, depending on the presence of autonomic arousal and glucocorticoids.

Introduction

When we perceive an actual or potential threat to our well-being (i.e., a stressor), our body initiates a cascade of physiological events. Within seconds after stressor exposure, the autonomic nervous system triggers the release of adrenaline and noradrenaline from the adrenal medulla, which in turn stimulate noradrenergic nuclei in the brain by activating vagal afferents to the nucleus of the solitary tract. In parallel to the activation of the autonomic nervous system, the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis leads via intermediate steps and with a delay of several minutes to the secretion of glucocorticoids (cortisol in humans) from the adrenal cortex. In concert with numerous other hormones, peptides, and neurotransmitters that are released during stressful experiences, adrenaline, noradrenaline, and glucocorticoids help us cope with ongoing challenges and, at the same time, prepare us for similar situations in the future. An integral part of how these stress mediators prepare us for future stress situations is by shaping learning and memory processes (Diamond et al., 2007, Joëls et al., 2011, Schwabe et al., 2012). Stress hormones promote lasting memories; in particular the formation of memories for events that are related to the stressor is enhanced by stress hormones (Cahill et al., 2003, McGaugh and Roozendaal, 2002, Sandi et al., 1997, Smeets et al., 2007, Zoladz et al., 2011).

Although stress may facilitate memory formation and consolidation, it is commonly assumed that stress impairs memory retrieval (de Quervain et al., 1998, Guenzel et al., 2013, Kuhlmann et al., 2005, Roozendaal et al., 2004, Schwabe and Wolf, 2009, Smeets et al., 2008; but see also Schilling et al., 2013, Schwabe et al., 2009). These disruptive effects of stress on retrieval are mainly mediated by glucocorticoids (Buchanan et al., 2006, de Quervain et al., 1998, de Quervain et al., 2000), in interaction with noradrenergic arousal (de Quervain et al., 2007, Roozendaal et al., 2004, Roozendaal et al., 2006a). The stress-induced impairment of memory retrieval might be beneficial for coping with stress in the sense that it reduces distraction by stressor-unrelated information and allows well-established habits and routines to control behavior (Schwabe and Wolf, 2010, Schwabe and Wolf, 2013).

A general retrieval impairment in stressful situations, both for stressor-related and stressor-unrelated information, however, would be clearly disadvantageous. According to a popular model (Joëls et al., 2006), rapid noradrenaline and glucocorticoid actions facilitate specifically the processing of information relevant to the ongoing stressor. Although this model focusses primarily on memory formation, there is some evidence that rapid actions of stress mediators might also facilitate, within a relatively short time window, memory retrieval processes. In particular, noradrenergic arousal has been associated with enhanced memory retrieval (Sara, 2009). For instance, stimulation of the locus coeruleus, the origin of noradrenergic forebrain projections, enhances retrieval in rats (Devauges and Sara, 1991). Similarly, the locus coeruleus is active during successful memory retrieval in humans (Sterpenich et al., 2006). Moreover, noradrenergic blockade impairs memory retrieval, both in humans and rats (Devauges and Sara, 1991, Kroes et al., 2010, Murchison et al., 2004). Based on these data, it can be hypothesized that, whereas stress-induced cortisol impairs retrieval, noradrenergic arousal may facilitate memory retrieval, particularly for information related to the stressful situation.

In the present experiment, we tested the hypothesis that stress may not necessarily impair memory retrieval and that stress-induced elevations in autonomic arousal and cortisol may have opposite effects on remembering. To this end, participants first learned neutral and emotional material. Twenty-four hours later, memory was tested either in a common free recall test (control condition) or in a stressful retrieval situation that resembled the well-known Trier Social Stress Test (TSST; Kirschbaum et al., 1993). Thus, in the ‘retrieval-stress’ condition, participants retrieved the learned material under stress, when autonomic arousal was high but cortisol concentrations not yet increased. Moreover, retrieval was a pivotal part of this stress situation and hence stressor-related. We predicted that autonomic arousal would enhance retrieval performance under stress. In order to contrast the hypothesized effects of autonomic arousal on retrieval with those of stress-induced cortisol, participants recalled part of the learned material after the stressor (or control condition), when cortisol concentrations were elevated. We expected that cortisol would impair memory retrieval, based on previous evidence (Buchanan et al., 2006, de Quervain et al., 1998, de Quervain et al., 2000). Moreover, because it has been shown that stress and glucocorticoid effects on memory are more pronounced for emotional than for neutral material (Buchanan et al., 2006, Cahill et al., 2003), we included both neutral and emotionally arousing stimuli and predicted that the effects of autonomic arousal and, in particular, those of cortisol would be stronger for emotional than for neutral stimuli.

Section snippets

Participants

Seventy-two non-smoking university students (36 men, 36 women; age: M = 23.2 years, SEM = 0.4 years) participated in this experiment. Exclusion criteria were checked in a standardized interview and comprised current illness or medication intake, current or life-time history of any psychiatric or neurological disorder, drug abuse, smoking, and in women the use of hormonal contraceptives. In addition, women were not tested during their menses. All participants provided written informed consent before

Day 1: Cortisol and blood pressure at encoding

Before the learning session on day 1, participants in the control and stress groups did not differ in their salivary cortisol concentrations (control vs. stress group (M ± SEM): 8.22 ± 0.87 nmol/l vs. 8.37 ± 0.71 nmol/l), in systolic (127.83 ± 2.24 mmHg vs. 133.60 ± 2.61 mmHg) or diastolic blood pressure (74.74 ± 1.12 mmHg vs. 76.38 ± 1.48 mmHg; all ts < 1.69, all ps > 0.10).

Day 1: Learning performance

In the immediate free recall test on day 1, participants recalled on average 9.4 neutral and 11.1 negative words as well as 13.8 neutral and 16.8

Discussion

It is commonly accepted that stress interferes with memory retrieval (Roozendaal et al., 2006a, Schwabe et al., 2012). Most studies supporting this view, however, tested retrieval 20–30 min after stress, when cortisol concentrations reach peak levels (Buchanan et al., 2006, Kuhlmann et al., 2005, Schwabe and Wolf, 2009, Smeets et al., 2008). Here, we asked whether stress does indeed universally impair memory retrieval and tested participants’ memory for previously learned material during a

Role of funding sources

Funding for this study was provided by the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf; the Heinrich-Heine-University had no further role in study design in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Vera Steinheuser, Patricia Nixon, Ann-Christin Boysen, Janine Hoffart, and Micha Keller during data collection.

References (41)

  • L. Schwabe et al.

    Socially evaluated cold pressor stress after instrumental learning favors habits over goal-directed action

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (2010)
  • L. Schwabe et al.

    Stress and multiple memory systems: from ‘thinking’ to ‘doing’

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2013)
  • T. Smeets et al.

    Context-dependent enhancement of declarative memory performance following acute psychosocial stress

    Biol. Psychol.

    (2007)
  • T. Smeets et al.

    True or false? Memory is differentially affected by stress-induced cortisol elevations and sympathetic activity at consolidation and retrieval

    Psychoneuroendocrinolgy

    (2008)
  • P.R. Zoladz et al.

    Pre-learning stress differentially affects long-term memory for emotional words, depending on temporal proximity to the learning experience

    Physiol. Behav.

    (2011)
  • T.W. Buchanan et al.

    Impaired memory retrieval correlates with individual differences in cortisol response but not autonomic response

    Learn. Mem.

    (2006)
  • R.L. Buckner et al.

    The cognitive neuroscience of remembering

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • L. Cahill et al.

    Enhanced human memory consolidation with post-learning stress: interaction with the degree of arousal at encoding

    Learn. Mem.

    (2003)
  • D.J. de Quervain et al.

    Preventive effect of ß-adrenoceptor blockade on glucocorticoid-induced memory retrieval deficits

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • D.J. de Quervain et al.

    Stress and glucocorticoids impair retrieval of long-term spatial memory

    Nature

    (1998)
  • Cited by (51)

    • Facing stress: No effect of acute stress at encoding or retrieval on face recognition memory

      2021, Acta Psychologica
      Citation Excerpt :

      Stress prior to retrieval impairs both recall (e.g., Kuhlmann, Piel, & Wolf, 2005; Schönfeld et al., 2014; Smeets et al., 2008) and recognition performance (Li, Weerda, Guenzel, Wolf, & Thiel, 2013; Schwabe & Wolf, 2014), with stronger effects for recall than recognition (see Gagnon & Wagner, 2016). Furthermore, retrieval stress tends to elicit larger negative effects for emotional than neutral stimuli (e.g., Kuhlmann et al., 2005; Schönfeld et al., 2014). Thus, the common view is that stress interferes with retrieval performance, though stressor timing, type of memory test, and valence moderate these effects.

    • Acute stress, memory, and the brain

      2019, Brain and Cognition
    • Acute psychosocial stress effects on memory performance: Relevance of age and sex

      2019, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
      Citation Excerpt :

      Regarding the role of sex, most of the aforementioned studies only included men (Boehringer et al., 2010; Domes et al., 2004; Kuhlmann et al., 2005; Li et al., 2013, 2014; Oei et al., 2006; Schwabe et al., 2009; Tollenaar et al., 2008, 2009), women (Schoofs & Wolf, 2009), or mixed-sex samples (Wolf et al., 2002). Studies on the role of sex have generally found no sex-related differences (Beckner et al., 2006; Buchanan & Tranel, 2008; Espín et al., 2016; Schönfeld et al., 2014; Schwabe & Wolf, 2009, 2014). To the best of our knowledge, only one study reported impairing effects of the TSST on free recall of emotional and neutral pictures in men, but not in women, although no sex-related differences were found in the negative effects on the recognition of positive pictures (Hidalgo et al., 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text