Report
Two studies of menstrual synchrony: Negative results

https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4530(91)90021-KGet rights and content

Abstract

In 1971 McClintock reported menstrual synchrony in pairs and groups of women who spent time together. The two studies reported herein, based on the methods and research design introduced by McClintock, fail to replicate her results. The first study is of a sample of 132 women who were sorority members or roommates of sorority members living on the campus of a large coeducational state university. The second study is of a sample of 24 women who were members of a cooperative house near the same university. In the subjects from both studies, the final mean onset absolute difference is greater than the initial mean onset absolute difference, and there are more nonsynchronous pairs of subjects than synchronous pairs. The sample from the sorority study was progessively reduced to exclude those subjects with irregular menstrual cycle lengths and those pairs in which one subject was taking oral contraceptives. Menstrual synchrony did not emerge in the reduced sample. Thus, whether or not menstrual synchrony occurs among women who spend time together should still be considered a hypothesis requiring further investigation.

References (16)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (43)

  • Always follow your nose: The functional significance of social chemosignals in human reproduction and survival

    2015, Hormones and Behavior
    Citation Excerpt :

    Subsequent research showed, that the timing of ovulation in particular is affected by chemosensory signals of other women (Shinohara et al., 2001; Stern and McClintock, 1998). However, there still exists a considerable amount of null-findings on menstrual synchrony (e.g. Jarett, 1984; Strassmann, 1997; Wilson et al., 1991), and most studies with positive findings in this field have been criticized for questionable statistical methods (e.g. Doty, 2010). Moreover, the evolutionary significance of synchronized menstrual cycle, somewhat invalidating female mate choice, is still a matter of debate (McClintock, 2002).

  • No evidence for ovarian synchrony or asynchrony in hamadryas baboons

    2010, Animal Behaviour
    Citation Excerpt :

    On the contrary, ovarian cycles in captivity appear to be more stable than those in free-ranging populations, and should not provide any additional barrier to cycle coordination. As has been demonstrated in several other studies, ‘true’ synchrony and asynchrony, that is, stable phase matching across multiple cycles, is impossible to obtain given the presence of inter- and intrafemale ovarian cycle variation (Jarett 1984; Wilson et al. 1991; Wilson 1992; Strassmann 1997, 1999; Arden & Dye 1998; Schank 2000b, 2001a, b, c; Yang & Schank 2006; Ziomkiewicz 2006). ‘True’ synchrony and asynchrony require the maintenance of stable cycle lengths that are integer multiples of one another.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Dr. Hildebrandt Kiefhaber and Dr. Gravel are currently affiliated with AT&T, Denver CO, and Career Planning and Placement, Stephens College, Columbia MO, respectively.

View full text